Water Warriors Equalizer

For products released in 2009

Would you recommend this product to another?

Yay (i.e. recommend)
4
100%
Nay (i.e. don't recommend)
0
No votes
Undecided (i.e. not sure yet)
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 4

Water Warriors Equalizer

Postby isoaker_com on Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:57 am

Water Warriors Equalizer Review

Willing to share your experiences, thoughts, personal reviews on this product? If so, post below!

Note: you must be a member of iSoaker.net to be able to post.
:: Leave NO one dry! :: iSoaker.com / iSoaker.net ::
User avatar
isoaker_com
Site Admin
 
Posts: 6757
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 1:51 pm
Location: Here

Re: Water Warriors Equalizer

Postby martianshark on Tue May 04, 2010 10:37 pm

This doesn't make a bad sidearm. It's pretty compact, and has good power. However, it's pump volume is very small, though not as bad as the sting ray's. Anyway, I'd reccomend the Max-D 3000 more because they they're more compact, have just as much power, and come in two packs right now for nearly the same price. Therefore, I'm going to vote "not recommended."
User avatar
martianshark
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:32 pm
Location: Mars

Re: Water Warriors Equalizer

Postby ncog on Wed May 05, 2010 5:46 am

I wouldn't put the Equalizer in the same category as a Max-D 300 personally; the 3000 is a pistol sized sidearm whilst the Equalizer makes a fine secondary weapon (or even light primary depending on the situation). While they both have the same output, I'd pick the Equalizer over the 3000 any day because of its superior capacity, shot time and handling. It's certainly one of the most comfortable soakers I've ever used, as opposed to the 3000's awkward grip. While the 3000 is better as a sidearm, I'd say that the Equalizer is a much better all-round soaker as it can perform more duties better.

Also, how are you comparing the pump volumes, since both soakers are air pressure based? Are you simply measuring the length of the pump shafts?
ncog
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 5:30 am
Location: new zealand

Re: Water Warriors Equalizer

Postby martianshark on Wed May 05, 2010 2:32 pm

Hmm... It is a pro that it has greater capacity, but I'd still prefer a Max-D 3000 because it can be held with one hand and is cheaper. Its firing valve also opens in the blink of an eye, and it has an internally tethered cap, so it doesn't get in the way when filling. But depending on the situation, I might choose an Equalizer instead of a Max-D 3000 (For example, if you can only use one weapon, or if I have to stay away from water sources for a long amount of time).
User avatar
martianshark
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:32 pm
Location: Mars

Re: Water Warriors Equalizer

Postby wetmonkey442 on Thu May 13, 2010 10:03 am

Here's a few photos I took a few days ago. Feel free to use them if you want, iSoaker.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Last edited by wetmonkey442 on Thu May 13, 2010 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
wetmonkey442
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 8:36 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: Water Warriors Equalizer

Postby C-A_99 on Thu May 13, 2010 12:00 pm

martianshark wrote:Hmm... It is a pro that it has greater capacity, but I'd still prefer a Max-D 3000 because it can be held with one hand and is cheaper. Its firing valve also opens in the blink of an eye, and it has an internally tethered cap, so it doesn't get in the way when filling. But depending on the situation, I might choose an Equalizer instead of a Max-D 3000 (For example, if you can only use one weapon, or if I have to stay away from water sources for a long amount of time).


Well I prefer the CPS 2500 because of it's power. You're comparing two almost completely different blasters for completely different uses here. The Equalizer's size and weight puts it in the same class as the FF, Max-D 6k and 5k, not as a pocket blaster. And I already went over pump volume; the pump volume is higher than the MD3k's because the pump stroke is longer whilst the diameter remains much the same.

Those are some pretty good pictures WM posted. The stream looks fairly weak though; perhaps it wasn't powered up completely.
Teams, Armory, Local Water Warfare, etc. HydroBrawl Water Warfare.
User avatar
C-A_99
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:12 pm
Location: Troy, MI (in case of water war w/ any1 over 12 on city property, angry mothers are to call police)

Re: Water Warriors Equalizer

Postby martianshark on Thu May 13, 2010 5:43 pm

I have found streams to look smaller when you take a picture of them than they are in real life. By the way, I don't see any pictures.

After using it in some battles, I have changed my mind about the Equalizer a little. It's definitely better than the Max-D 3000 and I even think it's better than the Vanquisher - it's smaller and has just about as much power as the Vanquisher's 3x setting and possibly even longer shot time.
Last edited by martianshark on Thu May 13, 2010 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
martianshark
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:32 pm
Location: Mars

Re: Water Warriors Equalizer

Postby C-A_99 on Thu May 13, 2010 5:48 pm

Well, this is exactly why I've never used Photobucket. My guess is that they have stringent bandwidth limitations and immediately take down a picture as soon as they find that it's been direct-linked. You (WM) may want to post a link to the gallery itself on Photobucket.

Streams neither look smaller nor larger in pictures. You have several reference points in a picture, such as the ground and surrounding objects but most importantly, the blaster itself is a reference to stream sizes. Just look at that stream picture closely (if Photobucket gets it to work again); the stream is not only weak but also breaking up easily thus you know it's a weak stream.

On second thought, I disagree with having blasters of the FF/MD6k class be PR's. That blaster size is enough to hold a PC, and the Equalizer as a whole doesn't appear to be as concealable as the MD5k and other larger PR's. (Well, except for the Oozinator of course.)
Teams, Armory, Local Water Warfare, etc. HydroBrawl Water Warfare.
User avatar
C-A_99
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:12 pm
Location: Troy, MI (in case of water war w/ any1 over 12 on city property, angry mothers are to call police)

Re: Water Warriors Equalizer

Postby ncog on Fri May 14, 2010 3:04 am

I can attest that the Equalizer has a strong stream...Mine shoots at a good range (at least 35 feet) with no break-up, and the shot time is excellent (a good 5 or so seconds at max range before drop-off starts, from memory). The trigger is also lovely and smooth and the handle is really comfortable too. BBT got pretty much everything right with the Equalizer imo (a translucent reservoir would make it perfect)
ncog
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 5:30 am
Location: new zealand

Re: Water Warriors Equalizer

Postby martianshark on Fri May 14, 2010 2:05 pm

Yeah, the handle is way more comfortable than any Max-D handle. I guess that's another pro.

I thought I got way more shot time than that on about 1/2 a tank.
User avatar
martianshark
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:32 pm
Location: Mars

Re: Water Warriors Equalizer

Postby SEAL on Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:31 pm

I got this for my brother's birthday. I must say, I definitely like it.
It sure makes an excellent back-up. The only problem, is that it's kind of hard to have in a pocket. So you could ether have it in a backpack, or clip it on to your belt if you have one.

I vote Yay. It's sorta in between a back-up and a light primary. In the kind of fighting I always do,(Small wars or soakfests.) then it could easily be used for a primary. In bigger wars though, I'd use it for back-up.
User avatar
SEAL
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:37 am
Location: 2 Hours north of New York City


Return to 2009

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron